Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013
Montag, 2. September 2013
Power - Macht - English - Überarbeitet
Linda
Block,
BA
social work
1.Semester
Alice
Salomon Hochschule
Power
an
Essay
Course:
Foundations
of Sociology
Naomi
Ryland
“Wouldn't
it be great, to prove Nietzsche was wrong?”
Index
Page 1
- Introduction
- What is Power?
- Thesis
Page 2
- Why are people longing for power?
- Power in history
Page 3
- Change
- Opinions of others
Page 4
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
„Keine
Macht für Niemand“ [1](„No Power for nobody.“) was something
Rio Reiser already claimed in 1972 with his Band „Ton, Steine,
Scherben“.
But
was is Power? Who owns Power? Can you buy it or only receive it? Can
anybody become powerful or just some? Why should nobody got it,
related to Reiser? And is owning the right word for it?
Only
one thing is proven: Power exists. Everywhere and for Decades.
Lots
of Literature is about Power. Nevertheless nobody likes to be
occupied with this topic.
Power
is something bad, something dirty. Everybody would like to hide it.
But
that's not possible.
If
you, like I will do here, start from the premise that Power exists
everywhere at any time, than you automatically ask yourself the
question:
Why
is it something bad for us?
I
can't think about anything what we title with such poorly attributes
which is so close to us.
And
why don't we change that?
There
would be two ways to change the character of Power.
Either
the perception or the art of exertion.
In
the course of this work I will take a look at the Power in the
presence and in the past.
I
hope these pages could inspire you. Could make you curious, could
bring you to question yourself.
To
make you stop taking everything as it shows you on the first view.
As
a first Information I recommend you to take a look in Leon Manns’
Book “Sozialpsychologie” (2001) just for getting in the mood.
In
politics, social science
and, power
is
the ability to
influence
the
behaviour of people. The term
authority
is
often used for power perceived as legitimate by the
.
Power can be seen as evil or unjust, but the exercise of power is
accepted as endemic to humans as social beings. In the corporate
environment, power is often expressed as upward or downward. With
downward power, a company's superior influences subordinates. When a
company exerts upward power, it is the subordinates who influence the
decisions of the
leader
(Greiner
& Schein, 1988).
3.
Thesis
I
want to prove, that Power is:
a)
There all the time
b)
reachable for everyone
Exercise
of Power related to other
- is unnecessary...
- … but not avoidable.
4.
Why are people longing for Power?
It
all starts when you are a little child:
After
some time you recognize that, when you are crying, your Mother or
Father will come to you .
You
get the attention, the cup of water or just your will.
And
so it goes on in your life:
Depending
on how your socialisation was, you make your own way:
But
when you weren't the one who get their will, then it was the parents
Power who did it that way.
So:
Power is unavoidable in your younger years.
It
seems to be a circular flow. If somebody forbids you to use Power he
uses it on his own.
One
out of two is always holding the Power. So Rio Reiser seems to be
right.
You
can hold Power.
People
have goals they want to reach. And if you want to reach your goal you
have to use your Power. Especially if there is someone who don't want
you to reach your goal, maybe because you want to get in a position
he don't want you because “you are not fitting” - because of your
race, your family or your political interests.
Elitism
is still a big deal, even if you maybe don't recognize it on the
first view.
It's
a circular flow which is hard to break through.
You
can decide to go with it and fight for what you long for or you have
to reorient.
5.
Power in History
To
understand what Power is or was just used for we have to take a look
in the History books.
In
Germany the first thought we have when we think of Power is Hitler.
He used his Power in a more than bad way by letting no one influence
him in his decisions. This is the ultimate Power and could of course
even be used for something good. But he didn’t do this. He made
decisions to kill a hole group of people he considered to be one of a
kind.
Let’s
see what some years later was:
Hitler
was gone and all united countries are in Germany. They took the power
they have to reform things what was nice, because they could have
done the completely different.
But
did they do it because they are nice people? Probably not. Like
always they just did it,because it will help them in future.
Then
take a look at the Russian side, especially when they founded the
GDR.
What
they have done is something completely different to what have the
united countries did.
Of
course, they brought their own system there “by force”, but just
because they wanted the people to have a better life - in communism.
Ok,
maybe just not because they just want the people to live better but
also for their own business, but the background thought behind
communism is more powerless then the democratic one, the social
market economy which was developed to keep the people silent.
So,
in fact, the Russians wanted to create something where everyone
nearly got the same amount of power. Unfortunately it didn’t worked
out this way.
I
would say it is because there was too much Power in one hand for a
time which took too long.
Like
Hitler, like the united countries, like every government in the
world.
If
you once tasted Power, you always reach for more and that makes you
blind for the people you live with.
6.
Change
But
how could we change they way Power is handled and how could we change
how everyone of us is using it?
If
we see the relation to history it seems to be very easy: We have to
take more responsibility on our own. Of course that isn’t making
everything more easy but it makes everything more fair for everyone.
Lots
of people sit down in their little lives and always sees the
responsibility in others hand, so they are used to that and they kind
of enjoy this easy way of thinking and living.
But
it’s mandatory to change yourself if you want the world to change.
And I can tell you: It won’t be easier then.
But
how are we able to change Power beyond ourselves?
We
could talk to people, get them out of their little world, they built
themselves and in which is it ok to be that powerful.
Angela
Merkel for example isn’t able to see how her work is working in the
real life. She hasn’t got the time for that. She just has
Co-Workers who can tell her, but maybe they are not that trustworthy
as she thinks.
Of
course, people are already fighting for her to listen, like you see
in Demonstrations, but maybe they are too less.
7.
Opinions of others
Of
course there are not just my thoughts about this topic found in
history. Bertrand Russell, for example made his own ones in “Power
– A new social analysis” (1938). The chapter “Forms of Power”
(Page 22,23) for example divides between naked and revolutionary ways
of Power.
Russell
says that revolutionary power, for him, is for example, “communism,
desire for national independence and Protestantism”
On
the other hand naked Power is based on fear and is made from
“power-loving (impulse of) individuals and groups”.
But
it isn't that easy anyway. He also says that power can be seen from
both sides.
For
example a democratic country can be “naked related to the
anarchist” but “not naked relating to the opposing political
parties.”.
Luhmann
based his knowledge on Power in communication. In his opinion,
related to Parsons, it is a “symbolic generated medium of
communication” (1975:3)[2].
For
example: Sometimes you didn't even have to talk, because you already
KNOW that the other person is more powerful than you – and then you
talk (communicate) they way you think to have to talk to your
counterpart. And so the communication defines the power. And it is
not the same in every system.
Mathias
Junge describes “power as a wealth” you got ( Macht und Moral,
2003:11) and says it can lead to something or block something.
Rainer
Paris says, that someone “ needs the wants to be a leader, if he
wants to be one” (related to Scheler,1957:259) [3]
Nietzsche
brought power together with moral and said it is especially found in
the enforcing way of power.[4]
Durkeim
says in 1984 (Page 85) [4] that “Moral isn't just a system of
habits, it's a system of orders.”
But
how can these thoughts of the big thinkers help us to come to an
conclusion? How will it help us to prove the thesis I constructed at
the beginning?
Let's
take a look.
8.
Conclusion
Thesis
1:
Power is there all the time
When
we connect to Luhmann and the thoughts about parenthood,work-life and
politics, I had before we can say yes: Power is there all the time,
because it's already in our communication.
According
to Nietzsche, Durkheim and Junge, power isn't just reachable for
everyone, everyone already got it. If it is true and it's a wealth
and it's already included in moral. You can bend moral the way you
“want” and already if you bend the ruling moral you accomplish
power.
Well,
this is a thesis hard to prove. Related to Russell power isn't
unnecessary, because you need it for changing something.
I
wish to think that power is unnecessary, but maybe I am a little
anarchist in that way. But I also know that anarchy is a utopia.
It's
unnecessary in many way we use it, for example in work-life by
sharing the tasks and being more responsible for the outcome.
But
it is mandatory for changing something big.
Thesis
4: Power
is not avoidable
Foucault
once said that power is “ what is showing the most and so hiding
the best”(1978:189), so no, power is not avoidable, because we're
not even able to see everything of it.
And
also because we will need it for “jumping out of the line” -
otherwise we will be like robots. All the same.
So
well, my favourite theory isn't proven. But hey, maybe it will be in
some decades and we all are able to live without the using of power.
When all of us are trying to change something ( of course with a
great use of this power, we want to avoid ), maybe we can keep power
low and develop our own, new morals to prove Nietzsche was wrong?
9.
Bibliography
When
it isn't already explained after the quote
[1]
Keine
Macht für Niemand. Die Geschichte der Ton Steine Scherben , Kai
Sichtermann, Jens Johler, Christian Stahl (2000)[2] Power : reflections on theories of power, Sebastian Dietzel (2010) – Luhmann meets Foucalt
[3] Normale Macht, Rainer Paris (2005)
[4] Macht und Moral, Matthias Junge (2003)
Samstag, 17. August 2013
Did I ever introduced you to this?
Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2013
My burial wish list part 2
Definitily!
So, my, maybe unborn, family: You will need a big screen :)
This is just too beautiful!
Mittwoch, 1. Mai 2013
Immer am 1.Mai
... ja, ich weiss auch nicht, was genau ich hier schreiben soll...
Jedes Jahr am 1.Mai jährt sich der Todestag meiner Oma.
Meiner Oma die mir so viel bedeutet hat. Mehr als ich je in Worte fassen könnte.
Meine Oma war einfach immer da. Jeden Tag. Sie war immer an meiner Seite.
Hat mir die besten Ratschläge, die niemals Schläge waren, gegeben.
Sie hat mich ein Stück weit geführt.
Wir hatten so viel gemeinsam. ...
Und dann. Von jetzt auf gleich ... war sie nicht mehr da.
Unser letztes Gespräch war so intensiv, so innig....
Sie war die einzige der ich immer alles sagen konnte und die mich nie verurteilt hat.
Ich habe sie nur einmal angelogen ... und das bereue ich bis heute.
Sie war einfach DIE Person,
Und jedes Jahr am 1. Mai tut es genauso weh, als wäre sie vor ein paar Minuten gegangen.
Ich habe ihr versprochen, dass ich nach Lübeck zurück komme .. ich habe es nie getan.
Ich konnte es nicht tun.
Ich weiss, dass sie weiss, dass ich es nicht konnte.
Und trotzdem fühle ich jedes Jahr dasselbe. Bedauern. Trauer.
Dass ich ihr das nie geben konnte, obwohl ich es doch versprochen habe.
Es tut mir so leid! Es tut mir so weh...!
Du fehlst mir so!
Jedes Jahr am 1.Mai jährt sich der Todestag meiner Oma.
Meiner Oma die mir so viel bedeutet hat. Mehr als ich je in Worte fassen könnte.
Meine Oma war einfach immer da. Jeden Tag. Sie war immer an meiner Seite.
Hat mir die besten Ratschläge, die niemals Schläge waren, gegeben.
Sie hat mich ein Stück weit geführt.
Wir hatten so viel gemeinsam. ...
Und dann. Von jetzt auf gleich ... war sie nicht mehr da.
Unser letztes Gespräch war so intensiv, so innig....
Sie war die einzige der ich immer alles sagen konnte und die mich nie verurteilt hat.
Ich habe sie nur einmal angelogen ... und das bereue ich bis heute.
Sie war einfach DIE Person,
Und jedes Jahr am 1. Mai tut es genauso weh, als wäre sie vor ein paar Minuten gegangen.
Ich habe ihr versprochen, dass ich nach Lübeck zurück komme .. ich habe es nie getan.
Ich konnte es nicht tun.
Ich weiss, dass sie weiss, dass ich es nicht konnte.
Und trotzdem fühle ich jedes Jahr dasselbe. Bedauern. Trauer.
Dass ich ihr das nie geben konnte, obwohl ich es doch versprochen habe.
Es tut mir so leid! Es tut mir so weh...!
Du fehlst mir so!
Abonnieren
Posts (Atom)